Independent broker research
027Vol. IVJuly 10, 2026
Independent broker research

Broker comparison

MultiBank Group vs Pepperstone

Multibank Group and Pepperstone appear on many trader shortlists, and the right question is not which brand wins overall but which firm's current, verified terms fit your situation. Both brands operate through multiple legal entities, so the account you would actually open depends on where you live. This page sets out a checklist you can complete using primary sources: each broker's legal documents, fee schedules and the public registers of their regulators. Keep the Multibank Group review, the Pepperstone review and the Compare broker tool on hand to structure your comparison.

MultiBank Group vs Pepperstone cover image

MultiBank Group

Current broker data

Review
Rating
4.4 / 5
Minimum deposit
$50
Regulator labels
ASIC, AUSTRAC, BAFIN, CIMA +10
Markets listed
Forex, CFDs on Metals, CFDs on Shares, CFDs on Indices, CFDs on Commodities +1
Editorial status
Editorial notice

Editorial notice

MultiBank Group and MEX Exchange both operate under ASIC license 416279, held by MEX Australia Pty Ltd (issued 20 March 2012; ACN 155 084 058; registered in Sydney NSW). These two brokers are corporate-linked under shared regulatory coverage rather than independent alternatives.

Pepperstone

Current broker data

Review
Rating
4.9 / 5
Minimum deposit
$0
Regulator labels
ASIC, SCB, CySEC, DFSA UAE +3
Markets listed
Fore, Indices, Currency Indices, Commodities, Softs +2
Editorial status
No current notice

How to read this comparison

The facts below come from InvestorTrip's current broker database and linked review pages. They are a screening aid, not a claim that a broker is available, cheaper or safer for every country, account type or legal entity.

Step 1: Confirm entities, licences and client protections

Begin with regulation, because it defines everything else about your account. Establish which Multibank Group entity and which Pepperstone entity would accept clients from your country, then verify each entity's authorisation directly on the relevant regulator's register. Match the registered legal name and licence number to the account agreement you are asked to sign, since a brand-level claim of regulation does not tell you which protections apply to you. Also read what each entity's documents say about client money handling, negative balance treatment and complaint procedures, and note the date of every document you rely on.

Key checks: Identify the specific legal entity at each broker that would hold your account before comparing features or costs.; Verify licences on the regulator's own register and match names and numbers to the client agreement.; Check each entity's stated arrangements for client money and complaint handling in current documents.; Record the dates of everything you verify, since entity structures and terms change..

Step 2: Compare total trading costs on identical inputs

A fair cost comparison uses the same instruments, comparable account types and every cost line. From each broker's current fee documents, collect typical spreads, any commissions, overnight swap or financing charges, currency conversion costs and non-trading fees such as withdrawal or inactivity charges. Confirm the minimum deposit, available base currencies and conditions for each account tier at the entity that serves you. Avoid copying figures from dated articles or forums; broker schedules are revised often and regional entities can publish different numbers. The Compare broker tool can help you keep both columns consistent while you work.

Key checks: Source all cost figures from each broker's current published schedules and note when you checked them.; Include overnight financing and conversion charges, which matter more than spreads for many strategies.; Confirm account tiers, minimum deposits and base currencies for your country's entity.; List non-trading fees such as withdrawal and inactivity charges from the current terms..

Step 3: Trial execution, support and withdrawals before funding fully

Documents show intent; testing shows behaviour. Open demo accounts with both brokers and run the same set of trades, recording execution quality, slippage and platform stability across different market conditions. Ask each support team a precise question about your entity, fees or withdrawal process and compare how accurately they answer against their own documents. If you decide to proceed, fund a modest amount at each broker, trade at small size, and complete a full withdrawal before committing serious capital. Cross-check your practical findings against the fields documented in the Multibank Group review and the Pepperstone review.

Key checks: Run identical demo trade sets at both brokers and keep a written log of execution behaviour.; Test support with specific factual questions and note whether answers match published documents.; Verify the withdrawal process with a small real-money cycle before scaling your deposit.; Re-verify fees, regulation and account terms periodically after you open an account..

Verdict

No universal winner exists between Multibank Group and Pepperstone. The suitable broker for you is the one whose entity-level regulation, verified cost schedule, tested execution and confirmed withdrawal process satisfy the checklist above for your specific situation. Record your findings using the Multibank Group review, the Pepperstone review and the Compare broker tool, and let your own documented verification, not a headline ranking, drive the decision.